Getting the Purple Finger
The Iraqi people gave America the biggest thank you in the best way we could have hoped for. Reading this election analysis from Betsy Hart, a columnist for the Scripps Howard News Service, I found myself thinking about my late grandmother. Half blind and a menace behind the wheel of her Chevrolet, she adamantly refused to surrender her car keys. She was convinced that everywhere she drove (flattening the house pets of Philadelphia along the way) people were
|Peter Pismestrovic, Kleine Zeitung, Austria|
So it is with Betsy Hart and the other near-sighted election observers: They think the Iraqi people have finally sent America those long-awaited flowers and candies, when Iraqs voters just gave them the (purple) finger.
The election results are in: Iraqis voted overwhelmingly to throw out the US-installed government of Iyad Allawi, who refused to ask the United States to leave. A decisive majority voted for the United Iraqi Alliance (UIA); the second plank in the UIA platform calls for a timetable for the withdrawal of the multinational forces from Iraq.
There are more single-digit messages embedded in the winning coalitions
platform. Some highlights: Adopting a social security system under which
the state guarantees a job for every fit Iraqi...and offers facilities to citizens
to build homes. The UIA also pledges to write off Iraqs debts,
cancel reparations [to Kuwait] and use the oil wealth for economic development
projects. In short, Iraqis voted to repudiate the radical free-market
policies imposed by former chief US envoy Paul Bremer and locked in by a recent
agreement with the International Monetary Fund.
So will the people who got all choked up watching Iraqis flock to the polls support these democratically chosen demands? Please. You dont set timetables, George W. Bush said four days after Iraqis voted for exactly that. Likewise, British Prime Minister Tony Blair called the elections magnificent but dismissed a firm timetable out of hand. The UIAs pledges to expand the public sector, keep the oil and drop the debt will likely suffer similar fates. At least if Adel Abd al-Mahdi gets his way hes Iraqs finance minister and the man suddenly being touted as leader of Iraqs next government.
Al-Mahdi is the Bush Administrations Trojan horse in the UIA. (You didnt think they were going to put all their money on Allawi, did you?) In October he told a gathering of the American Enterprise Institute that he planned to restructure and privatize [Iraqs] state-owned enterprises, and in December he made another trip to Washington to unveil plans for a new oil law very promising to the American investors. It was al-Mahdi himself who oversaw the signing of a flurry of deals with Shell, BP and ChevronTexaco in the weeks before the elections, and it is he who negotiated the recent austerity deal with the IMF. On troop withdrawal, al-Mahdi sounds nothing like his partys platform and instead appears to be channeling Dick Cheney on Fox News: When the Americans go will depend on when our own forces are ready and on how the resistance responds after the elections. But on Sharia law, we are told, he is very close to the clerics.
Iraqs elections were delayed time and time again, while the occupation and resistance grew ever more deadly. Now it seems that two years of bloodshed, bribery and backroom arm-twisting were leading up to this: a deal in which the ayatollahs get control over the family, Texaco gets the oil, and Washington gets its enduring military bases (call it the oil for women program). Everyone wins except the voters, who risked their lives to cast their ballots for a very different set of policies.
But never mind that. January 30, we are told, was not about what Iraqis were voting for it was about the fact of their voting and, more important, how their plucky courage made Americans feel about their war. Apparently, the elections true purpose was to prove to Americans that, as George Bush put it, the Iraqi people value their own liberty. Stunningly, this appears to come as news. Chicago Sun-Times columnist Mark Brown said the vote was the first clear sign that freedom really may mean something to the Iraqi people. On The Daily Show, CNNs Anderson Cooper described it as the first time weve sort of had a gauge of whether or not theyre willing to sort of step forward and do stuff.
This is some tough crowd. The Shiite uprising against Saddam in 1991 was clearly not enough to convince them that Iraqis were willing to do stuff to be free.
Stephen Peray, [politicalcartoons.com]
So whats the prize? An end to occupation, as the voters demanded? Dont
be silly the US government wont submit to any artificial
timetable. Jobs for everyone, as the UIA promised? You cant vote
for socialist nonsense like that. No, they get Geraldo Riveras tears (I
felt like such a sap), Laura Bushs motherly pride (It was
so moving for the President and me to watch people come out with purple fingers)
and Betsy Harts sincere apology for ever doubting them (Wow
do I stand corrected).
And that should be enough. Because if it werent for the invasion, Iraqis would not even have the freedom to vote for their liberation, and then to have that vote completely ignored. And thats the real prize: the freedom to be occupied. Wow do I stand corrected.